SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 297

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Nitin Jamdar, CJ, S.MANU, J
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
KARUNAKARAN K.K. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 10th day of January 2025) NITIN JAMDAR, C.J. Heard Mr.C.Ajith Kumar, learned counsel for the Appellant and Mr.Ajith M. Jiji, learned counsel for Respondent No.1.

2. This Writ Appeal, under Section 5 of the Kerala High Court Act , 1958, challenges the judgment dated 17 December 2024 in W.P.(C) No.44956 of 2024, whereby the Respondent/Original Petitioner is granted an opportunity to repay the outstanding amount in ten equated monthly installments.

3. The Petitioner had availed a loan of Rs.35,00,000/- from the Appellant Bank after securing it by creating an equitable mortgage of his properties. Due to the default made in its repayment, the account was classified as a 'Non-Performing Asset' (NPA). Thereafter, proceedings were initiated u/s 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act, 2002. Being aggrieved by the above, a Writ Petition was preferred.

4. It is not in dispute before us that against the action initiated by the Respondent - Bank under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act , 2002 the Writ Petitioner has the remedy to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top