HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Nitin Jamdar, CJ, S.MANU, J
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
KARUNAKARAN K.K. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Dated this the 10th day of January 2025) NITIN JAMDAR, C.J. Heard Mr.C.Ajith Kumar, learned counsel for the Appellant and Mr.Ajith M. Jiji, learned counsel for Respondent No.1.
2. This Writ Appeal, under Section 5 of the Kerala High Court Act , 1958, challenges the judgment dated 17 December 2024 in W.P.(C) No.44956 of 2024, whereby the Respondent/Original Petitioner is granted an opportunity to repay the outstanding amount in ten equated monthly installments.
3. The Petitioner had availed a loan of Rs.35,00,000/- from the Appellant Bank after securing it by creating an equitable mortgage of his properties. Due to the default made in its repayment, the account was classified as a 'Non-Performing Asset' (NPA). Thereafter, proceedings were initiated u/s 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act, 2002. Being aggrieved by the above, a Writ Petition was preferred.
4. It is not in dispute before us that against the action initiated by the Respondent - Bank under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act , 2002 the Writ Petitioner has the remedy to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.