HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P. G. Ajithkumar, JJ
M.SAKTHIVEL – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. grounds for review (Para 3) |
| 2. subsequent overruling not grounds (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. subsequent events consideration (Para 6) |
ORDER
P.G. Ajithkumar, J.
This is a petition filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil procedure, 1908. The petitioner seeks to review judgment dated 08.06.2016 in the original petition.
2. O.P.(CAT) No.144 of 2016 was filed challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench in O.A.No.50 of 2014. The petitioners filed the said original petition claiming that they were entitled for refixation of pensionary benefits, counting the annual increment that fell due on the 1st July, although they retired on 30th June in the respective years. The Tribunal did not allow that claim. This Court as per the judgment dated 08.06.2016 affirmed the said view taken by the Tribunal. The petitioners would now contend that the Apex Court as per Annexure I judgment dated 11.04.2023 accepted the contentions of various employees that they were entitled to reckon the annual increment fell due on 1st July, despite their retirement O.P.(CAT)No.144 of 2016 on the preceding day, i.e., 30th June of the respective years. The petitioners accord
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.