JUDGMENT

This Original Petition has been filed challenging Exts.P3 and P6 orders passed by the Family Court, Thodupuzha.

2. The petitioner is the husband of the respondent.

The respondent filed a maintenance case against the petitioner as M. C. No.50/2022 before the Family Court, Thodupuzha under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.). The respondent also filed an application for interim maintenance. The Family Court as per Ext.P3 order granted an interim monthly maintenance of ₹10,000/- to the respondent. Thereafter, the petitioner filed Ext.P4 application to cancel Ext.P3 order under Section 127 (1)(2) of the Cr.P.C. It was dismissed as per Ext.P6 order. 3. I have heard the counsel for the petitioner.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that Ext.P3 order was passed without giving an opportunity to the petitioner to file objection statement. The learned counsel further submitted that the respondent is a Government employee and the petitioner has now lost his job and these factors were n