HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J
RAFEEQUE C K – Appellant
Versus
THE GENERAL MANAGER, MANJERI CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD – Respondent
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) 22143/2017
Securitisation - Loan Default - SARFAESI Act - Sections not explicitly cited - The court addressed the financial hardship of the petitioner seeking relief under the SARFAESI Act, allowing an installment payment plan, and implicated consequences for defaulting.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner defaulted on a cash credit facility from the respondent bank, which initiated recovery proceedings under the SARFAESI Act. The petitioner requested to repay the outstanding amount in installments due to financial hardship.
Finding of the Court:
The court considered the petitioner's financial difficulties and permitted the repayment of the outstanding amount in 12 installments, with conditions for abeyance of recovery proceedings based on compliance.
Issues: Whether the petitioner could remit the overdue amount in installments and avoid immediate recovery actions by the bank due to financial hardship.
Ratio Decidendi: The decision balanced the need for the bank to recover debts under the SARFAESI Act and the petitioner's right to seek relief in light of financial challenges, permitting manageable installment payments.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petitioner to repay the outstanding amount in 12 installments with specific conditions.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, who had availed a cash credit facility from the respondent bank, defaulted in repayment of the same. Consequently, the respondent bank initiated proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstructions of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, hereinafter referred to as the 'SARFAESI Act', to recover the loan amounts. Ext.P2 is the notice issued to the petitioner by the Advocate Commissioner. In the writ petition, the petitioner impugns the steps initiated by the respondent bank for recovery of the loan amounts.
2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as also the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.
3. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made across the bar, I note that the sole prayer of the petitioner is to permit him to remit the balance amounts outstanding to the bank in easy installments. Taking into account the plea of financial hardship raised by the petitioner, I dispose the writ petition with the following directions:-
(i) The total overdue amount, in respect of the cash credit facility availed by the petitioner, as of today, is stated to be Rs.27,53,901/- . Accordingly, if the petitioner remits the aforesaid amount of Rs.27,53,901/- together with accrued interest in 12 equal and successive monthly installments commencing from 31.07.2017, and continues to keep up the regular installment payments as per the original loan schedule, and conforms to the requirements of the respondent bank for maintaining the cash credit facility, then the recovery steps initiated against him by the respondent bank shall be kept in abeyance.
(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner commits a default in respect of any of the installments, he will lose the benefit of this judgment and the respondent bank will be free to continue the recovery proceedings against him from the stage at which they presently stand.
(iii)The respondent bank shall furnish the petitioner with an up-to-date statement, of the dues position together with interest, within 10 days from today, so as to enable the petitioner to discharge his liability in accordance with the directions in this judgment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.