HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.HARILAL, J
MITHUN C S PILLAI – Appellant
Versus
MANAGER – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is the son of Sri. Chellappan Pillai and Smt. Sandhya. The said Chellappan Pillai and Sandhya had no children. So the petitioner being the youngest sister's son of Sandhya, they adopted him, when he was at three months old. The petitioner came to know this only on the death of his father Sri. Chellappan Pillai in the year 2013. Ext.P1 SSLC Book, Ext.P2 ration card and Ext.P3 legal heir certificate issued by the Tahsildar prove the fact that the petitioner is the son of Sri. Chellappan Pillai and Smt. Sandhya. The father of the petitioner, Sri. Chellappan Pillai, while working as Field Supervisor under the respondents died of heart attack on 24/7/2013. The petitioner filed Ext.P7 application, seeking appointment under the dying-in-harness scheme, before the 1st respondent through the 2nd respondent. To the requirements in Ext.P8 letter served to the petitioner, he had submitted all the documents and is repeatedly approaching the respondents to get appointment under the dying-in-harness scheme; but the same has not been considered so far. This is the grievance projected in this writ petition and with these averments, this writ petition is filed with a prayer t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.