SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 657

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.HARILAL, J
MITHUN C S PILLAI – Appellant
Versus
MANAGER – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the son of Sri. Chellappan Pillai and Smt. Sandhya. The said Chellappan Pillai and Sandhya had no children. So the petitioner being the youngest sister's son of Sandhya, they adopted him, when he was at three months old. The petitioner came to know this only on the death of his father Sri. Chellappan Pillai in the year 2013. Ext.P1 SSLC Book, Ext.P2 ration card and Ext.P3 legal heir certificate issued by the Tahsildar prove the fact that the petitioner is the son of Sri. Chellappan Pillai and Smt. Sandhya. The father of the petitioner, Sri. Chellappan Pillai, while working as Field Supervisor under the respondents died of heart attack on 24/7/2013. The petitioner filed Ext.P7 application, seeking appointment under the dying-in-harness scheme, before the 1st respondent through the 2nd respondent. To the requirements in Ext.P8 letter served to the petitioner, he had submitted all the documents and is repeatedly approaching the respondents to get appointment under the dying-in-harness scheme; but the same has not been considered so far. This is the grievance projected in this writ petition and with these averments, this writ petition is filed with a prayer t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top