SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 49229

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SUNIL THOMAS, J
MUHAMMED @ BAPPUTTY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.P.SAMSUDIN, SRI.JITHIN LUKOSE, SRI C K PRASAD

COMMON ORDER

These cases arise from Crime Nos.118 of 2017 and 119 of 2017 both of Karuvarakundu Police Station.

2. In Crime No.118 of 2017, the victim, who is a 14 year old boy, who is the second respondent herein alleged that 4 of the accused subjected the minor to unnatural offence, one after another in a cocoa grove on a day in October 2016. FIS was lodged on 29.05.2017 and crime was registered. After investigation, final report was laid for offences punishable under section 377 r/w 34 of the IPC and under sections 7 and 8 of POCSO Act. The case is now pending as S.C.No.846 of 2017 of the District and Sessions Court, Manjeri. It is stated in the Crl.M.C that the disputes have been settled between the parties and affidavits in support of the settlement have been produced as Annexures-A4 and A5 signed by respondents 3 and 4, who are the parents of the victim. They seek to quash the proceedings. In Crime No.119 of 2017, the allegation is that some time in march 2015, the same victim as in Crime No.118 of 2017 was subjected to unnatural offence by 5 other accused. FIS was laid on 29.05.2017 along with Crime No.118 of 2017. Crime was registered as Crime No.119 of 2017. After investig

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top