JUDGMENT

There is not representation for the appellant. Counsel for the respondent represented. Appellant absent. Counsel absent. Appeal is dismissed for default.

03/09/2010 SD/- M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE ORDER ON CMP. NO.2706/1996 IN AS. NO.411/1996 DISMISSED

03/09/2010 SD/- M.N.KRISHNAN , JUDGE TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss M.N. KRISHNAN, J.

...........................................

A.S.NO.411 OF 1996 .............................................

Dated this the 1st day of November, 2010.

J U D G M E N T

This is an appeal preferred against the judgment and decree of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Muvattupuzha in O.S.No.172/1993. The suit is one for setting aside document No.3475/1993 on the ground of fraud or coercion for want of consideration as it has not come into effect and for consequential injunction. The trial court dismissed the suit and it is against that decision, the plaintiff has come up in appeal.

2. Heard. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the appeal are stated as follows:. The plaintiff and defendant became partners in the sense that they were jointly dealing with the business of procuring visa for the interested persons. The plaintiff was formerly employed in Gulf cou