SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Online)(KER) 985

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
V.RAMKUMAR, J
BIJO ELIAS SO ELIAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


O R D E R

Petitioners who are accused Nos. 1 and 2 in C.R. No. 48/06 of Excise Range, Chirayinkeezhu for an offence punishable under Sec. 55(g) of the Abkari Act for allegedly transporting 3399 liters of spirit on 18-10-2006 and who were arrested on the same day, seek their enlargement on bail.

2. It is admitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that no final report has been filed even after 60 days of detention of the petitioners. If so, the petitioners are entitled to bail as of right under the proviso to Sec. 167 (1) Cr.P.C. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on each of them executing a bond for Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M -I, Attingal and subject to the following conditions:

1. The petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer

between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

2. The petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the

prosecution.

3. The petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail.

3. If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top