SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Online)(KER) 8488

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, K.T.SANKARAN, JJ
SUKKU KASSIM – Appellant
Versus
C.I. OF POLICE – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF, SRI.N.NAGARESH

JUDGMENT

BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, J.

This is a Writ Petition filed seeking police protection. The petitioner has constructed an office-cum-godown building in Nattakam Village. He is engaged in the purchase and sale of raw-rubber sheets. They are purchased, graded according to quality, packed and transported out. The said establishment is regularly engaging five workmen, it is submitted. The goods bought by them are unloaded by those five workmen. Loading of the packed goods is also done by engaging those workmen, it is submitted. They are permanent workers and the petitioner does not require the services of additional workmen. While so, respondents 4 to 6 came forward demanding work for their members and caused obstruction to the functioning of the petitioner's establishment. Therefore, the petitioner submitted Ext.P4 representation praying for police protection for doing loading and unloading work and transportation of goods. Since the police was not taking any action, this Writ Petition was filed seeking appropriate reliefs.

2. The fifth respondent has filed counter affidavit stating that the five workmen engaged by the petitioner are not headload workers. They are not registered under Ru

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top