SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 8530

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K VINOD CHANDRAN, J
MOHAMMED MANOJ – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.N.B.ANOOP

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the fact that the land, owned by the petitioner, having a total extent of 29.73 Ares, comprised in Survey Nos.87/13 and 87/14 of Puthenchira Village, is shown as 'nilam' in the village records and basic tax register. The said property of the petitioner is included in the draft data bank prepared under Section 28 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008 . The petitioner's property is lying as a pucca garden land and there are different types of trees and coconut trees in the said property, is the contention raised. The petitioner filed Ext.P2 application, before the 1st respondent, which is pending consideration. The prayer of the petitioner is to direct the District Collector, the 1st respondent herein, to consider and dispose of Ext.P2, an application filed under Clause (6) of the Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967 , (for brevity “KLU Order”), within a reasonable time.

2. Since the land is included in the draft data bank and the description is shown as 'nilam' in the Basic Tax Register (B.T.R), it is only proper that a report is received from the Agricultural Officer and Kerala State Remote Sensing and Environ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top