SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 11566

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SUNIL THOMAS, J
SAROJINI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.ABU MATHEW, SRI.AJU MATHEW, SRI.VINUCHAND, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.T.R.RANJITH

O R D E R

The petitioners are the accused in S.C.No.687/2016 of the Assistant Sessions Court II A, Calicut arising from Crime No.255/2015 of Thiruvambady Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143 , 147, 452, 323, 324, 308, 427, 506 and 149 IPC . It was alleged by the prosecution that, the accused formed into an unlawful assembly, trespassed into the shop of the defacto complainant and assaulted him with a wood piece and granite piece with the intention of causing fatal injuries.

2. The petitioners contended that, they were attacked, for which a counter case was registered as Crime No.256/2015 for various offences and that the matter has now been settled between the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents 2 and 3, who are the defacto complainant and the victims, submitted that, they have resolved their disputes. It was also submitted that, pursuant to Annexure A3, the matter was compounded before the Judicial First Class Magistrate. Learned counsel for the petitioners invited my attention to Annexures A4 and A5, which are the affidavits filed by respondents 2 and 3 referring to the agreement produced as Annexure A3. It

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top