HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SUNIL THOMAS, J
SAROJINI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
O R D E R
The petitioners are the accused in S.C.No.687/2016 of the Assistant Sessions Court II A, Calicut arising from Crime No.255/2015 of Thiruvambady Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143 , 147, 452, 323, 324, 308, 427, 506 and 149 IPC . It was alleged by the prosecution that, the accused formed into an unlawful assembly, trespassed into the shop of the defacto complainant and assaulted him with a wood piece and granite piece with the intention of causing fatal injuries.
2. The petitioners contended that, they were attacked, for which a counter case was registered as Crime No.256/2015 for various offences and that the matter has now been settled between the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents 2 and 3, who are the defacto complainant and the victims, submitted that, they have resolved their disputes. It was also submitted that, pursuant to Annexure A3, the matter was compounded before the Judicial First Class Magistrate. Learned counsel for the petitioners invited my attention to Annexures A4 and A5, which are the affidavits filed by respondents 2 and 3 referring to the agreement produced as Annexure A3. It
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.