JUDGMENT

In this Writ Petition, the petitioners have inter alia prayed for issuing a writ in the nature of certiorari or such other appropriate writ or order or direction quashing Ext. P10 series of orders.

2. Heard.

3. No counter has been filed by the respondents.

4. In Ext. P10 series, the Land Tribunal held that since no rule had been framed by the Government, the time and manner of application could not be prescribed and consequently, the original applications were not maintainable. In Ext. P10 series, the Land Tribunal observed that the petitioners were having the liberty to approach the Tribunal again as and when the rules were framed by the Government.

5. The Rules were framed in 2015, submitted by the learned Government Pleader and also the learned counsel for the W.P. (C ) No. 11533 of 2010 N petitioners. Since the Rules have been already framed, the petitioners shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal again as observed by the Tribunal. For the said reason, Ext. P10 series of orders stand quashed.

In the result, this writ Petition stands disposed of as above with a direction that if the petitioner approaches the Land Tribunal with an application under Section 106 (B) of th