JUDGMENT

Manjula Chellur,CJ Appellant is before us in a second round of litigation. On earlier occasion he approached this Court in W.P.(C).No.26513 of 2009 and the judgment came to be passed as per Ext.P3. It came to be confirmed in Writ Appeal No.2738 of 2009 as also in Review Petition, which are at Exts.P4 and P4A. A Special Leave Petition came to be filed by the State in S.L.P(C) No.15423 of 2010 which came to be dismissed as per Ext.P6 order dated

10.05.2010.

2. In the earlier round of litigation, writ of mandamus was sought directing the respondent authorities to issue a No Objection Certificate in order to enable him to commence running of the saw mill, in the alternative he sought for a direction to consider Ext.P5 application and pass orders within a time limit to be fixed by the Court. The entire litigation ended in favour of the appellant herein. What is relevant is, subsequent to the disposal of the S.L.P, Ext.P1 impugned order came to be passed by the Divisional Forest Officer, the 2nd respondent herein cancelling the No Objection Certificate issued to the petitioner. According to the appellant-writ petitioner, this is in violation of principles of natural justice as no