ORDER

The Review Petitioners herein are the petitioners in the above writ petition. The writ petition was disposed of, extracting the settlement report dated 26.11.2012 and 25.06.2013 which also mentioned about the settlement agreements duly signed by the parties in presence of the trained mediators. But the settlement agreements were omitted to be extracted. The learned counsel for the Review Petitioners submits that, if the settlement agreements are not attached to the judgment, it will cause much hardship to the petitioners.

2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.

3. After hearing, this Court finds it fit and proper to incorporate the settlement agreements also, forming part of the judgment. In the said circumstance, the interim settlement agreement dated 23.11.2012 and the Memorandum of Agreement under Section 89 of the code of Civil Procedure r/w R.P. No. 623 of 2013 -2-

Rules 24 and 25 of the Kerala Civil Procedure (Mediation) Rules, 2008, are also extracted, to be incorporated in the judgment.

Interim Settlement Agreement dated 23.11.2012 “The parties after a detailed discussion in mediation has decided to arrive at an interim settlement in the above case on the foll