HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.N.RAVINDRAN, J
T.C.KURIAKOSE – Appellant
Versus
THE VILLAGE OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C)/29585/2009
Tax - Land Ownership -
Fact of the Case:
Petitioners purchased land parcels and paid basic tax until 2008-09. The Village Officer disputed their title, leading to non-receipt of tax. Petitioners sought relief, citing a letter from the District Collector regarding tax collection without impacting government rights.
Finding of the Court:
The court noted the existing dispute over land ownership but ordered the Village Officer to accept tax payments while clarifying that such payments do not confer title on the petitioners nor affect government rights.
Issues: Whether the petitioners can be compelled to pay basic tax while their title to the land remains contested.
Ratio Decidendi: The court recognized that tax payment does not confirm land ownership and that the government retains its rights irrespective of the payment.
Final Decision: The Village Officer must accept tax payments from the petitioners for the current and future years without confirming title.
Judgment
Heard Sri.M.P.Ashok Kumar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri.M.A.Asif, the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
2. The petitioners’ purchased different parcels of land as per different sale deeds executed on the very same day. The lands purchased form part of a large tract of land 60.20 acres in extent. After the petitioners purchased the land, they availed loans from various banks on the security of the land. The grievance voiced by the petitioners in these writ petitions is that the Village Officer, Kalpetta Village is not receiving basic tax from the petitioners, though basic tax for the year 2008 – 2009 was received from them.
2. The learned Government Pleader submits on instructions that the respondents dispute title of the petitioners over the land and that is the reason why basic tax was not received from the petitioners. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the District Collector, Wayanad has in the letter dated 8.10.2009 sent to the Land W.P.(C) No.29585/2009 &
connection -2-
Revenue Commissioner stated that there is no illegality in receiving land tax from the petitioners. A copy of the said letter was made available to me for perusal. The District Collector has in the said letter stated that the enquiry being conducted against the petitioners is in progress and that basic tax can be received from the petitioners without prejudice to the rights of the Government. Payment of revenue by the petitioners will not confer title on them if otherwise they have no title to the lands in their possession. The mere payment of land tax by the petitioners will not also affect the rights of the Government if the Government has paramount and superior title. In such circumstances, I dispose of these writ petitions with a direction to the Village Officer, Kalpetta to receive land tax from the petitioners for the current financial year and also for the succeeding financial years without prejudice to the rights of the Government. It is clarified that payment of land tax by the petitioners on the strength of this judgment will not affect the rights, if any, that the Government have over the lands belonging to the petitioners. It is also clarified that nothing contained in this judgment will stand in the way of the W.P.(C) No.29585/2009 &
connection -3-
Government from proceeding against the petitioners in accordance with law, if the Government have title over the lands.
P.N. RAVINDRAN Judge vaa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.