SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Online)(KER) 14425

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A.HARIPRASAD, J
JAYAKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
MANJU P.C – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU (SR.), SRI.M.REVIKRISHNAN, SRI.V.C.SARATH

O R D E R

Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1727/2012 registered by Chalakudy Police under Sections 509 and 506(1) I.P.C.

2. Prosecution case in short is that on 11-08-2012, the accused/petitioner misrepresented to the defacto complainant that she had to attend a medical camp near Kunnamkulam and took her to Kadampuzha. After reaching at that place, he tried to take the defacto complainant to a room in a lodge and when she refused, she was threatened that he had a photograph of the defacto complainant with another person. Thereby he criminally intimidated her.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the first respondent and the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the entire allegations in Annexure A final report, if taken together, will not show neither the offence of criminal intimidation nor the offence of insulting the modesty of a woman by word, gesture or act.

5. Section 503 I.P.C defines criminal intimidation.

Section 506 I.P.C provides the punishment for the same. It can be seen that the section is in two parts; the first part refers to the act of threatening ano

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top