COMMON JUDGMENT

These petitions were filed by the petitioners challenging Ext.P5 order passed in both these cases under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

2. It is alleged in both the petitions that the second respondent is the husband of the petitioner and she filed Ext.P1 suits in both the cases, namely O.S.No.211/2016 and O.S.No.199/2016 on the file of the Munsiff Court, Thalassery, originally against the first respondent in those cases for injunction restraining the first respondent institutions from disbursing the amount in the account of her husband as he is an alcoholic and unable to look after himself and he has become senile on account of over alcoholism. Thereafter, though she filed an application for interim injunction that was not granted. In the meantime the second respondent himself has filed an application to get himself impleaded and that petition was allowed after conducting a preliminary enquiry under Order 32 Rule 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the court formed an opinion that he is capable of looking after his affairs and accordingly he has been impleaded as additional second respondent in all these cases. Thereafter he filed Ext.P3 application for g