SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 9492

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SUNIL THOMAS, J
SABERA – Appellant
Versus
MUHAMMED    Advocate - MAHESH V MENON ,MAHESH V MENON – Respondent


O R D E R

The revision petitioner herein is the petitioner in MC No.357/2005 of the Judicial Magistrate First Class Court, Kodungalur, in which she invoked the section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short),claiming relief against her former husband.

2. According to the facts available, the revision petitioner was married to the respondent herein on 13/9/1998. A child was born . Later the matrimonial relationship got strained leading to the several matrimonial proceedings. The respondent pronounced talaq on 25/1/2005. Claiming that the petitioner belonged to a middle class family and that the former husband had not paid her various benefits payable to her,the revision petitioner filed MC No.357/2005. In that she had sought for value of gold ornaments or money which was received from her, the value of mahar, maintenance during the iddah period and reasonable and fair provision under section 3 of the Act. The trial court, on the basis of the evidence let in by both the sides, granted maintenance quantified at the rate of Rs.6,000/- for the iddah period of three months and a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- as future maintena

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top