HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SUNIL THOMAS, J
SABERA – Appellant
Versus
MUHAMMED Advocate - MAHESH V MENON ,MAHESH V MENON – Respondent
O R D E R
The revision petitioner herein is the petitioner in MC No.357/2005 of the Judicial Magistrate First Class Court, Kodungalur, in which she invoked the section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short),claiming relief against her former husband.
2. According to the facts available, the revision petitioner was married to the respondent herein on 13/9/1998. A child was born . Later the matrimonial relationship got strained leading to the several matrimonial proceedings. The respondent pronounced talaq on 25/1/2005. Claiming that the petitioner belonged to a middle class family and that the former husband had not paid her various benefits payable to her,the revision petitioner filed MC No.357/2005. In that she had sought for value of gold ornaments or money which was received from her, the value of mahar, maintenance during the iddah period and reasonable and fair provision under section 3 of the Act. The trial court, on the basis of the evidence let in by both the sides, granted maintenance quantified at the rate of Rs.6,000/- for the iddah period of three months and a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- as future maintena
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.