SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 2044

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J
BABU MICHAEL – Appellant
Versus
DR ANI C PANICKER – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

Petitioners in these writ petitions separately challenge the action of the Government in withdrawing the nomination of members of the Syndicate and appointing certain others in their respective places.

2. The short facts involved in the writ petitions would disclose that the petitioners were members of the Syndicate of Mahatma Gandhi University nominated by the Government under Section 21 of the Mahatma Gandhi University Act . The petitioners were nominated in January, 2016 under the category of other members as detailed in Clauses (a), (c) and (d) of . Ext.P1 is the notification dated 18/1/2016. The Government in the State changed in May, 2016. Though a meeting was scheduled on 23/5/2016, it had to be adjourned to 16/6/2016 on account of obstruction created by certain persons. Petitioners had to approach this Court by filing WP (C) No. 20133/2016 seeking police protection for participating in the meeting of the Syndicate. In the meantime, Government as per Ext.P3 letter dated 23/6/2016 intimated the Registrar of the University that the existing nominated members including the petitioners are replaced by a new set of people. Pursuant to Ext.P3, University issued a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top