HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J
M V FRANCIS OOMMEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioner claims that he is having properties in old Survey Nos.106/1, 106/2 and 106/10 of Nedumpram Village, Thiruvalla Taluk, Pathanamthitta Revenue District and that adjacent to his property there is a puramboke thodu situated in old Survey No.106/3. The petitioner's case is that after the re- survey, 1Ares of petitioner's property was wrongly left out and incorporated in new sub-division. The said piece of land is essential for the beneficial enjoyment of the other properties of the petitioner and that even in the predecessors-in-interest of the petitioner, were in possession of the said property. Since there was no cultivation for quite some years, the said piece of land remains reclaimed by nature. That the said piece of land has been wrongly incorporated in the Basic Tax Register (B.T.R) as bhoostithivazhi and the same has now been interpolated as “nalathuvazhi or thodu”, it is averred. The petitioner would assert that it is not a puramboke. To fortify the said contention, the petitioner would place reliance on an order of the Government which according to him would make it clear that land described as bhoostithivazhi or nalathuvazhi is not a puramboke. That th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.