JUDGMENT

Ext.P2 order dated 30.7.2013, by which the second respondent, who has duly declared the election of the office bearers of the petitioner, has refused to recognise the petitioner as a registered Sports Organisation on the ground that they did not comply with the direction in Circular No.G.O.(P) No.2/2012 dated 2.3.2012, as well as Ext.P4 letter dated 22.7.2013 issued by the third respondent to the second respondent which discloses that an adhoc committee consisting of respondents 5 to 9 was constituted making them a state representative of the third respondent are under challenge in this writ petition.

2. The petitioner alleges that it is a recognised sports organisation defined under Section 2 (xii) of the WPC No.20842 of 2013 2 Sports Act, 2000 and the second respondent, who has duly declared the election of the office bearers of the petitioner, is refusing to recognise this registered sports organization and on the contrary has proceeded to recognise a totally unauthorised and illegal body as the registered sports organisation wherein respondents 5 to 9 are styled as adhoc committee members. The petitioner alleges that the stand of the second respondent in Ext.P2 is incor