SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Online)(KER) 4112

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J
KAIDRU – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL GAFOOR – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE, SMT.VANAJA MADHAVAN, SHRI K.S.BHARATHAN

J U D G M E N T

----------------------

As per verumapat chit No.974/1955 dated 10.8.1955 executed by the appellant in favour of the predecessor-in-interest of the respondent, suit property was given into the possession of the appellant for constructing shop building and conducting trade therein for a period of 3 years fixing the rent at Rs.24/- per year payable in 12 instalments on the 10th of each calender month. Appellant accordingly constructed shop building and was conducting trade therein. While so, suit property was assigned to the respondent as per assignment deed No.326/1973. In the meantime, S.M.P. No.4396 of 1973 was initiated as if the appellant is a cultivating tenant of the suit property entitled to fixity of tenure and purchase the right of the landlord under the Kerala Land Reforms Act (for short, “the Act”). The Land Tribunal dismissed the application. Appellant unsuccessfully challenged that order in A.A. No.845 of 1977. Appellant refused to vacate the premises as demanded by the respondent. Appellant, in reply to the notice demanding vacant possession contended that he is a commercial lessee entitled to the protection of Sec.106 of the Act. According to the respond

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top