SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Online)(KER) 20628

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J
P V VENUGOPAL – Appellant
Versus
CHAMI ALIAS RAMACHANDRAN – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

This petition is filed by the plaintiffs in O.S.No.15 of 2008 of the court of learned Sub Judge, Palakkad aggrieved by Ext.P7, a single word order whereby the learned Sub Judge has allowed the application for impleadment made by the respondent under Rule 10(2) of Order I of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, “the Code”). According to the petitioners they are the legal heirs of Aiyya Pattar to whom the suit property - 7.97 acres belonged. It is the case of petitioners that Aiyya Pattar had given on lease certain other items belonging to him to one Mallu. Petitioners and other legal heirs of Aiyya Pattar filed O.S. No.337 of 1989 for partition of the suit property impleading one Retna Babu also as defendant since he claimed right over property. Regarding the claim of Retna Babu over the suit property, the suit was decreed for partition among the other legal heirs of Aiyya Pattar. Decree in O.S. No.337 of 1989 has become final and was put into execution. In the meantime Retna Babu filed O.S. No.267 of 1989 for specific performance of an alleged agreement for sale of a share of the suit property against some other legal heirs of Aiyya Pattar. That suit ended in a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top