JUDGMENT

Alleging that the respondents are trying to rescind the resolution passed by the respondent Municipality to grant NOC to the petitioner in order to get over and nullify Annexure A1 judgment, the petitioner has filed this Contempt petition.

2. The writ petition was allowed directing the second respondent to issue formal orders conveying NOC for starting FL-3 bar in the petitioner's hotel within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. Though a review petition was filed, the same was heard on merits and it was dismissed as per order dated 29.10.2014. The petitioner points out that no appeal has been filed from Annexure-A1 judgment.

3. The first respondent filed a counter affidavit pointing out that she was not a party to the original COC No.1265/2014 in WPC No.2656/2014 2 proceedings, but she has been arrayed as the first respondent in her capacity as Municipal Chairman. According to her, she took charge only on 10.11.2014. She has pointed out that the council was to meet on 8.1.2015. The petitioner had requested the Congress Parliamentary Party, of which the petitioner was elected as a leader, to include the grant of NOC to the petitioner in th