SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Online)(KER) 40269

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J
BHUVANACHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


O R D E R

This criminal revision petition is directed against the concurrent finding and sentence passed against the petitioners five in number for offences under Secs.143, 148 and 307 r/w 149 IPC. For offence under Sec.307 IPC, they were sentenced to undergo R.I. for two years and to pay `2,000/- each as fine. For offences under Secs.143 and 148 IPC, they were sentenced to undergo R.I. for two months and six months each respectively. PW1 and PW2 are the persons who sustained injuries in the incident. PW3 is the independent witness to the occurrence. PW7 is the doctor who treated PW1 and PW2. The allegation was that the petitioners inflicted injuries on PW1 and PW2 with swords, iron pipe, iron rod etc. Learned Asst. Sessions Judge placed reliance on the evidence given by PWs.1 to 3 to hold that the petitioners are guilty of the offences as mentioned above. After re-appreciation of the evidence, learned Addl. Sessions Judge confirmed the conviction and sentence passed against the petitioners.

2. Learned counsel for the revision petitioners would submit that the medical evidence produced by the prosecution in this case is contradictory to the evidence given by PWs.1 to 3. It is submit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top