HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.HEMA, J
P.RAGHAVAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNA PILLAI – Respondent
JUDGMENT
A suit was filed before Munsiff Court by first respondent against appellant (D2) and his wife (D1) for declaration of title, possession and for putting up of boundary and also for injunction. During the pendancy of the suit, appellant's wife (D1) died and hence respondents 2 to 5 were impleaded as additional defendants. After trial by Munsiff Court, the suit was dismissed with costs. In appeal, Additional District Court set aside the decree and judgment and decreed the suit as follows:
“i. The plaintiff's title and possession over the plaint schedule property is hereby declared.
ii. The plaintiff is allowed to put up a boundary through the A B line shown in Ext.C1(a) plan for separating the plaint schedule property from the property of defendants.
iii. The defendants are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the paint schedule property and from committing waste theron.
iv. The parties are directed to suffer their respective costs in this appeal and in the [S.A.145/2001] 2 suit. Ext.C1(a) plan will form part of the decree.”
The said decree and judgment are challenged by second defendant in the second appeal.
2. A suit was filed by first r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.