SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(KER) 32347

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J
K IBRAHIMKUTTY – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER – Respondent


COMMON JUDGMENT

Introduction:

In all the writ petitions similar issues have been raised by identically placed employees against their common employer, the Kerala Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC). As such, it is felt desirable to dispose of all the writ petitions through a common judgement. For ease of reference and convenience, the facts as pleaded in W.P.(C) No.7813/2014 have been taken as the basis, apart from referring to the petitioner therein alone as representing the cause of all the petitioners in other writ petitions as well.

Factual Matrix:

2. To begin with, the factual matrix runs in a narrow WPC 5908/14 & con. cases 2 compass. The petitioner, a conductor in the respondent Corporation, initially secured his employment on the advice of the Kerala Public Service Commission (PSC) with a rank of 3002. After completing his probation, the petitioner availed himself of Leave Without Allowance (LWA) with effect from 15.11.2008 to 06.10.2010 for the purpose of securing employment abroad. Later, he rejoined duty on

07.10.2010.

3. After his rejoining, when the petitioner was hopeful that he had been back in the mainstream of the service and that he would be provided timely promotion, mu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top