SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 4603

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, J
JAYAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.S.ABHILASH SRI.K.SIJU SMT.S.SEETHA SRI.A.S.SREEKANTH

O R D E R

The petitioner is the sole accused in C.C No.

4848/2014 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Chalakkudy. He is proceeded against for having committed offence punishable under Sections 117 (e) and 118(a) of Kerala Police Act .

2. The prosecution allegation is that on 27.07.2014 at about 6.15 p.m, the petitioner was found in a public place in an intoxicated manner and rioting condition , in the course of which, he had obstructed and assaulted the de-facto complainant with intent to prevent him from discharging his official duty. The instant proceeding is initiated to quash the proceedings.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner relying on the judgment of this Court inShybu Mathew v. State of Kerala, (2012(1) KLT 653) contended that mere smell of alcohol is not sufficient to hold that a person was in an intoxicated stage. It is further urged that the offence under Sections 117 (e) and 118(a) by no stretch of imagination will be made out on facts. According to the learned counsel failure to conduct the Breath Analyzer test is fatal and the continuance of the proceedings ,is nothing but a futile exercise.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor refuted the content

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top