SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Online)(KER) 2939

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
R.BASANT, J
SREEKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


ORDER

The short grievance of the petitioner is that his application for exemption and his application for discharge filed before the learned Sessions Judge as Annexures-A3 and A4 have been dismissed without proper consideration.

2. The petitioner faces indictment in a prosecution for offences punishable, inter alia, under Secs.307, 324 and 326 read with Sec.149 IPC. He is the 6th accused. All the co- accused have already been tried, found not guilty and acquitted. The case against the petitioner was split up and coercive processes were issued against the petitioner. The petitioner came to this Court with Crl.M.C.No.708/08. Another Bench of this Court disposed of the petition with observations. In compliance with the said observations, the petitioner surrendered before learned Sessions Judge and was enlarged on bail. Thereafter, the case was posted to various dates. When the case was posted to 6/6/08, the petitioner filed Annexures-A3 and A4 applications. It was prayed that the petitioner may be discharged. It was further prayed that the petitioner may be exempted from personal appearance on that day. The petition seeking exemption from personal appearance was disposed of by Annexure-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top