SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Online)(KER) 1481

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J
DHANYA – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.), SRI.T.RAMPRASAD UNNI, SMT.SMITHA GEORGE

JUDGMENT

Heard both sides. Government Pleader takes notice for respondents.

2. Petitioner filed O.S.No.39 of 2006 in the court of learned Munsiff, Devikulam seeking reliefs against the respondents. In the course of the case, a power of attorney executed in favour of her father was filed in that court. On the strength of that power of attorney, petitioner filed I.A.No.1373 of 2008 requesting that the power of attorney holder be permitted to represent the petitioner and to give evidence in lieu of oral evidence of petitioner. Learned Munsiff as per order dated 20.10.2008 received the power of attorney, permitted the power of attorney holder to represent the petitioner but refused permission to tender oral evidence in lieu of the oral evidence of the petitioner. That order is under challenge in this Writ Petition.

3. It is contended by learned senior counsel appearing for petitioner that, that part of the order by which it refused permission to the power of attorney holder to tender oral evidence in lieu of the oral evidence of petitioner is illegal in the sense that the power of attorney holder is entitled to give evidence on behalf of the petitioner with respect to the matters in his p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top