SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 10519

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Kauser Edappagath, J
STATE OF KERALA – Appellant
Versus
SAMEERKUMAR MODI AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE - ADGP, SRI.MADHU RADHAKRISHNAN

JUDGMENT

Both the W.P.(C) and Crl.R.P. are connected.

2. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 859 of 2013 is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 engaged in the business of manufacturing and sale of cosmetics and other household products through direct/network marketing. In the year 2008, the Sub Inspector of Police, Vakathanam, Kottayam registered a crime against the petitioner company and its officials alleging offence under Sections 2 (c) and 4 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 (for short, 'the Banning Act'). The allegation is that the company was involved in doing business falling under the Banning Act. After investigation, the police filed Ext.P1 final report against the company's managing director and its employees. The case was taken on file by the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Kottayam (for short, 'the trial court') as C.C.No.49 of 2008. All the accused in C.C.No.49 of 2008 filed discharge petition before the trial court for discharge under Section 239 of Cr.P.C . contending that no prima-facie case has been made against them. The trial court, after a detailed consideration of the business plan of the company and after evaluating

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top