IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
Nassar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the court's conclusion and order regarding the bail applications. (Para 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT :
Raja Vijayaraghavan, J.
These Criminal Appeals have been preferred under Section 21 of the National Investigation Agency Act , 2008.
2. Crl. Appeal No. 225 of 2025 is preferred by the accused Nos. 25, 27, 31 and 32, Crl. Appeal No. 228 of 2025 is preferred by the accused No. 33 and Crl. Appeal No. 242 of 2025 is preferred by the accused Nos. 29, 30 and 51 in S.C.No.2/2023/NIA on the file of the Special Court for Trial of NIA Cases, Ernakulam.
3. In the above case, they, along with the rest of the accused, stand indicted for having committed offences punishable under sections 120B, 34, 109, 115, 118, 119, 143, 144, 147, 148, 449, 153A, 341, 302, 201 , 212 r/w.s. 149 , 120B r/w.s. 302 of IPC , Section 3 (a)(b)(d) r/w. Section 7 of the Religious Institutions (Prevention of Misuse) Act , 1988 and Sections 13 , 16, 18, 18A, 18B, 20, 22C, 23 , 38 & 39 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act , 1967 and Section 25 (1) (a) of the Arms Act , 1959.
4. By the order passed by the learned Special Court, the applications for bail preferred by the appellants were dismissed.
5. The br
State of U.P. v. Amarmani Tripathi
Gurwinder Singh v. State of Punjab
NIA v. Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali
Thwaha Fasal v. Union of India
Shaheen Welfare Assn. v. Union of India
Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab
Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee (Representing Undertrial Prisoners) v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.