HIGH COURT OF KERALA
AMIT RAWAL, J
S.Sudeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
National Insurance Company Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers :
“i. Call for the records leading to Ext.P9 order and to quash the same by the issue of a writ of certiorari ;
ii. to declare that the policy of the respondent company to deny the benefit of earned leave encashment and extended Medical Insurance to families of employees like the petitioner is illegal and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India ;
iii. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to disburse the amount due to the petitioner by way of earned leave encashment, loss due denial of extended medical insurance facility to the petitioner and to refund the amount deducted towards shortfall in notice period ;
iv. “c)(i) To declare that the termination of services of the petitioner, in essence, was voluntary retirement and that the petitioner is entitled for pensionary benefits under the 1995 Pension Scheme provided he fulfills the condition of refunding of the entire amount of the Corporation's contribution to the provident fund along with interest accrued thereon ;
v. c) ii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.