Back
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
T. R. Ravi, J
C. Lajith – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition with specific prayers for compensation. (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioners detail property ownership and impact of road widening. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. petitioners contest social impact assessment compliance. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. respondents argue for road project necessity. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. legal framework on land acquisition and public purpose defined. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. reformation in land acquisition law discussed. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. mandated procedures for social impact assessment emphasized. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 8. critical evaluation of compliance with existing statutes. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 9. discussion on procedural necessity for public participation. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 10. issues highlighted concerning the social impact assessment study. (Para 27 , 28) |
| 11. court's directive for proper assessment and issuance of relevant orders. (Para 29 , 30) |
JUDGMENT
WP(C)No.2945 of 2022
The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers;
(i) To declare that Rule 18(1) RCTLARR (Kerala) Rules, 2015 limiting the time period for filing objection to 15 days as against 60 days as stipulated under Section 15 of the Fair Compensation Act is ultra vires to the Right
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
