SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 60042

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
JOSEKUTTY – Appellant
Versus
TOM SOJAN – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 17TH MAGHA, 1945 RFA NO. 8 OF 2009 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DT. 28.11.2008 IN OS 131/2004 OF SUB COURT, PALA -----

APPELLANT/ 2 n d PLAINTIFF:

JOSEKUTTY, AGED 65 YEARS, S/O.THOMAS, MUTTATHU, CHENAPPADY MURI, ERUMELY SOUTH VILLAGE.

BY ADV SRI.M.NARENDRA KUMAR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:

1 TOM SOJAN, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.THOMAS, MUTTATHU, CHENAPPADY MURI, ERUMELY SOUTH VILLAGE.

2 MOLLY, AGED 42 YEARS, D/O.THOMAS, MUTTATHU, CHENAPPADY MURI, ERUMELY SOUTH VILLAGE.

3 RESMI SOJAN, AGED 20 YEARS, D/O.TOM SOJAN & MOLLY, MUTTATHU, CHENAPPADY MURI, ERUMELY SOUTH VILLAGE.

BY ADVS.

SRI.JOY GEORGE SMT.PRAICY JOSEPH THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON

06.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

SATHISH NINAN, J.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Dated this the 6th day of February, 2024

J U D G M E N T

The suit for cancellation of Exts.A7 to A9 Gift Deeds was dismissed by the trial court. The second plaintiff is in appeal.

2. The first plaintiff is the mother of the second plaintiff. The first defendant is another son

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top