Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
KRISHNAKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
G.GOPAKUMAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties involved in an appeal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the suits filed by both parties. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. suits barred by limitation. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. possession of property and evidence considered. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. need for declaration of title in injunction suits. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 6. grounds for injunction without title declaration. (Para 18 , 20) |
| 7. final ruling on dismissing the appeals. (Para 27) |
JUDGMENT
R.S.A.No.824 of 2020 has been filed under Section 100 r/w Order XLII of the Code of Civil Procedure , challenging the decree and judgment in O.S.No.583 of 2010 dated 26.02.2015 on the files of Sub Court, Kottayam and the decree and judgment in A.S.No.86 of 2015 dated 06.01.2020 on the files of the Additional District Judge, Kottayam. The appellant is the defendant in the suit – Sri.Krishnakumar. The respondent herein is the plaintiff in the suit – Sri.G.Gopakumar.
2. R.S.A.No.21 of 2021 is also filed by Sri.Krishnakumar, who is the plaintiff in O.S.No.183/2012 on the files of the Sub Court, Kottayam, challenging the decree and judgment of the above said order dated 26.02.2015 and confirmed by the decree and judgment in A.S.No.85 of 2015 dated 06.01.2020 on the fi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
