2024/KER/12168 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 8^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024/19TH MAGHA, 1945 RP NO.248 OF 2017 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 05.11.2014 IN WPC 28417/2010 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

NARAYANAN NAMBOODIRI, S/O.PURUSHOTHAMAN NAMBOODIRI, KUMARAMPULAKKAL MANAKKAL, CHERUKUDANGAD AMSOM, PALLIPRAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD -679 305.

BY ADVS.

SRI.C.S.MANU SRI.S.K.PREMRAJ RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

1 KRISHNAN NAMBOODIRI, S/O.PURUSHOTHAMAN NAMBOODIRI, KUMARAMPULAKKAL MANAKKAL, CHERUKUDANGAD AMSOM, PALLIPRAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD -679 305.

2 SAVITHRI ANTHARJANAM, D/O.PURUSHOTHAMAN NAMBOODIRI, KUMARAMPULAKKAL MANAKKAL, CHERUKUDANGAD AMSOM, PALLIPRAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD -679 305.

3 VASUDEVAN NAMBOODIRI, S/O.PURUSHOTHAMAN NAMBOODIRI, KUMARAMPULAKKAL MANAKKAL, CHERUKUDANGAD AMSOM, PALLIPRAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD-679 305.

4 K.M.RUGMINI @ THANKAM ANTHARJANAM, W/O.PURUSHOTHAMAN NAMBOODIRI, KUMARAMPULAKKAL MANAKKAL, PALLIPURAM, PATTAMBI TALUK, PALAKKAD -679 305.

5 HAREESH, S/O.K.M.RUGMINI @ THANKAM ANTHARJANAM, KUMARAMPULAKKAL MANAKKAL, PALLIPURAM, PATTAMBI TALUK, PALAKKAD -679 305.

6 DEEPA, DO.K.M.RUGMINI @ THANKAM ANTHARJANAM, KUMARAMPULAKKAL MANAKKAL, PALLIPURAM, PATTAMBI TALUK, PALAKKAD -679 305.

7 NARAYANAN NAMBOODIRI, S/O.NARAYANAN NAMBOODIRI, NJATTUVELA MANA, MANGALAM AMSOM, MODAPPAKKAD DESOM, OTTAPALM TALUK, PALAKKAD-679 301.

8 PRADEEP KUMAR, S/O.NARAYANAN NAMBOODIRI, NJATTUVELA MANA, MANGALAM AMSOM, MODAPPAKKAD DESOM, OTTAPALM TALUK, PALAKKAD -679 301.

9 PRAMOD, S/O.NARAYANAN NAMBOODIRI, NJATTUVELA MANA, MANGALAM AMSOM, MODAPPAKKAD DESOM, OTTAPALM TALUK, PALAKKAD -679 301.

BY ADVS.

SRI.PUSHPARAJAN KODOTH SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

08.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

Dated, this the 8^th day of February, 2024 This is the third posting, wherein the petitioner had not taken any steps as directed vide order dated 25.10.2022. On the last two occasions, there was no representation for the petitioner, as well. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner.

In the circumstances, this R.P. will stand dismissed, for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

C.JAYACHANDRAN, JUDGE ww