SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 63148

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N. NAGARESH, J
MATHAI VARKEY MUTHIRENTHY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: ANITHA MATHAI MUTHIRENTHY, S. RAJEEV, JOHN VARGHESE, JIMMY JOHN VELLANIKARAN, N.A. SHAFEEK, JIJO PAUL KALLOOKKARAN, SREENIVASAN K., SONU AUGUSTINE, S.A. ANAND, ISSAC M. PERUMPILLIL, SABU PULLAN, SHRI.N.MANOJ KUMAR, STATE ATTORNEY, SRI.K.R.RANJITH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
For the Respondents: MEENA.A., P. RAMAKRISHNAN, PREETHI RAMAKRISHNAN, T.C. KRISHNA, C. ANIL KUMAR, ASHA K. SHENOY, PRATAP ABRAHAM, VARGHESE VINOD RAVINDRANATH, K.C. KIRAN, M.R. MINI, M.DEVESH, ASHWIN SATHYANATH, ANISH ANTONY, ANATHAZHATH, SHRI.N.MANOJ KUMAR, STATE ATTORNEY, SRI.K.R.RANJITH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Table of Content
1. limitations of writ jurisdiction in civil disputes (Para 37 , 38 , 39)
2. writ petitions dismissed due to civil nature of disputes (Para 40)

J U D G M E N T

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

These three writ petitions are based on same set of facts and involve common questions of law. Hence, they are heard together and being disposed of by a common judgment.

2. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.39181 of 2022 and his family members are Parishioners of the 7th respondent- St. Mary’s Cathedral Basilica of Archdiocese of Ernakulam- Angamaly. The petitioner states that he is bound to attend the Mass as prescribed by the Holy See and the 6th respondent Synod of Major Archiepiscopal Church of Ernakulam-Angamaly. The petitioner states that the 5th respondent is the Apostolic Administrator of the 4th respondent Major Archdiocese of Ernakulam-Angamaly appointed by the Roman Pontiff and he has issued a Ext.P1 Circular dated 30.09.2022. The 5th respondent on 20.11.2022 declared that from 27.11.2022, the Unified Synodal Mass, as directed by Ext.P1 Circular will be celebrated in the Church at 6 a.m.

3. When the petitioner along with his wife reached the Church by 5.30 a.m., the gates of the Church wer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top