SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12401

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P, J
OBEESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Appl. 5437/2025



Advocates:
VIVEK VENUGOPAL, NOUSHAD K A, SR. PP.

Anticipatory bail granted under Section 74 of the BNS, considering no prior criminal record and the nature of allegations.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - Sections 329(3), 296(b), 324(2), and 74 - Anticipatory bail application - Allegations of trespass and assault against petitioners - The only non-bailable offence alleged is under Section 74, which pertains to the actions of the 3rd accused pushing the mother of the de facto complainant - No criminal antecedents reported against petitioners - Anticipatory bail granted with conditions. (Paras 2-6)

(B) Conditions for bail - Petitioners required to execute a bond and appear before the investigating officer, and must not contact the de facto complainant or interfere with the investigation. (Paras 6)

ORDER

This is an application for anticipatory bail

2. Petitioners are accused in Crime No.199/2025 of Vadakkekara police station, Ernakulam district, alleging commission of offences under Sections 329 (3) , 296(b) , 324(2) and 74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita ( BNS ), 2023.

3. Allegation against the petitioners is that, owing to animosity that the 1st accused had towards the father of the de facto complainant, petitioners trespassed into the house of the de facto complainant and the 1st accused verbally abused the de facto complainant’s father. It is further alleged that the 2nd accused pushed the gate of the house, as a result of which certain injuries were suffered by the de facto complainant on his right hand and damage was caused to the motor cycle parked near the gate. It is also alleged that the 3rd accused caught hold of the mother of the de facto complainant and pushed her down.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the only non-bailable offence alleged against the petitioners is that under Section 74 of the BNS and even if the entire allegations are accepted to be true, the offence under Section 74 of the will not be attracted in the facts of this case. It is submitted that the only allegation to attract the offence under Section 74 of the is that the 3rd accused had pushed the mother of the de facto complainant.

5. Heard the learned Public Prosecutor also. Learned Public Prosecutor refers to the First Information Statement and contends that there are allegations against the petitioners which would attract the offence under Section 74 of the BNS . It is submitted that, in such circumstances, the petitioners are not entitled to anticipatory bail.

6. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor and having regard to the fact that the only non-bailable offence alleged against the petitioners is that under Section 74 of the BNS and taking into account the fact that the allegation to attract the offence under Section 74 of the is that the 3rd accused in the case had pushed the mother of the de facto complainant by her shoulder, I am of the view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioners also taking into account the fact that there are no criminal antecedents reported against the petitioners.

In the result, this application is allowed. It is directed that the petitioners shall be released on bail, in the event of arrest in crime No.199/2025 of Vadakkekara police Station subject to the following conditions:-

(i) Petitioners shall execute bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the likesum to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer;

(ii) Petitioners shall appear before the investigating officer in Crime No.199/2025 of Vadakkekara Police station as and when summoned to do so;

(iii) The petitioners shall not attempt to contact the de facto complainant or interfere with the investigation or to influence or intimidate any witness in Crime No.199/2025 of Vadakkekara police station;

(iv) The petitioners shall not involve in any other crime while on bail.

If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the investigating officer in Crime No..199/2025 of Vadakkekara police station may file an application before the jurisdictional court, for cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top