SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12401

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P, J
OBEESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
VIVEK VENUGOPAL, NOUSHAD K A, SR. PP.

ORDER

This is an application for anticipatory bail

2. Petitioners are accused in Crime No.199/2025 of Vadakkekara police station, Ernakulam district, alleging commission of offences under Sections 329 (3) , 296(b) , 324(2) and 74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita ( BNS ), 2023.

3. Allegation against the petitioners is that, owing to animosity that the 1st accused had towards the father of the de facto complainant, petitioners trespassed into the house of the de facto complainant and the 1st accused verbally abused the de facto complainant’s father. It is further alleged that the 2nd accused pushed the gate of the house, as a result of which certain injuries were suffered by the de facto complainant on his right hand and damage was caused to the motor cycle parked near the gate. It is also alleged that the 3rd accused caught hold of the mother of the de facto complainant and pushed her down.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the only non-bailable offence alleged against the petitioners is that under Section 74 of the BNS and even if the entire allegations are accepted to be true, the offence under Section 74 of the will not be attracted in the facts o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top