IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P, J
VIJIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
ORDER
This is an application for regular bail.
2. The petitioners are accused Nos.4 and 5 in Crime No.343 of 2025 of Cherpu Police Station, Thrissur District, alleging commission of offences under Sections 126 (2) , 115(2) , 310(2) read with Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita ( BNS ), 2023. The allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners together with the other accused in the case had threatened the de-facto complainant, slapped her and had taken away about 17 ducks and thereby they have committed the offences alleged against them.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners in this case have absolutely no criminal antecedents. It is submitted that the offence of dacoity may not sustain against the petitioners. It is submitted that the issue has been settled between the petitioners and the de-facto complaint and the de-facto complaint, who is represented in Court through counsel, has no objection in bail being granted to the petitioners.
4. The learned Public Prosecutor submits that accused Nos.1 to 3, who are the petitioners in the connected bail application namely, Bail Application No.5615 of 2025, have serious criminal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.