SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12420

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P, J
RAZZAK G. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Appl. 5989/2025



Advocates:
P.K.SUBHASH, ASHITHA RIA MERIN, NOUSHAD K A, SR. PP.

Bail can be granted when allegations lack serious injuries and the accused has been in custody for an extended period, subject to stringent conditions.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 - Sections 126(2), 115(2), 110 - Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - Section 92(b) - Application for regular bail - Allegations of assault against a person with disabilities - Petitioner claimed innocence, asserting false accusations due to enmity - No serious injuries reported - Petitioner has been in custody since 03.04.2025 - Bail granted subject to stringent conditions. (Paras 1-4)

(B) Bail - Conditions for granting bail - Consideration of nature of allegations, duration of custody, and absence of serious injuries - Petitioner to execute bond and comply with reporting conditions. (Paras 3-5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner is accused of assaulting the de facto complainant and her son, who has disabilities, on 02.04.2025. The petitioner has been in custody since 03.04.2025, and claims the allegations are false due to prior enmity.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the petitioner could be granted bail due to the lack of serious injuries reported and the duration of custody.

Issues: The main issues were the nature of the allegations, the petitioner’s prior criminal history, and whether bail should be granted.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the absence of serious injuries and the petitioner’s prolonged custody warranted the granting of bail under stringent conditions.

Result: Application for bail allowed.

ORDER

This is an application for regular bail. Petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.281/2025 of Kumbla police station, Kasaragod District, alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2) and 110 of the Bharatiya Nayay Sanhita (BNS), 2023 and Section 92(b) of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act , 2016.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that, on 02.04.2025 at about 11 p.m., the petitioner restrained the de facto complainant and her son (who is a person with disabilities) and assaulted them and caused injuries to them and thereby committed the offences alleged against him. The petitioner has been in custody from 03.04.2025.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is absolutely innocent of the allegations levelled against him. It is submitted that no serious injuries are reported. It is submitted that the petitioner and the de facto complainant are neighbours and owing to some other enmity between them, a false case has been foisted on the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner may therefore be granted bail subject to conditions.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner has two other criminal cases registered against him in the year 2018. It submitted that going by the First Information Statement, the petitioner had attacked the de facto complainant owing to enmity arising out of the fact that the de facto complainant had sold certain property (through which the petitioner was illegally transporting river sand) to a third party. It is submitted that the investigation is progressing and therefore, the petitioner is not entitled to bail at this stage.

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor and considering the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, I am of the view that the petitioner can be granted bail subject to stringent conditions. The petitioner has been in custody from 03.04.2025. No serious injuries have been reported by the de facto complainant or her son. The criminal antecedents reported against the petitioner are cases registered in the year 2018. Therefore, the petitioner can be granted bail subject to stringent conditions. If the petitioner commits any offence while on bail, it will be open to the investigating officer to approach the Jurisdictional Court for cancellation of bail. Accordingly, this application for bail is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner shall execute bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like-sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court;

(ii) Petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer in Crime No.281/2015 of Kumbla Police station on every Saturday at 11 am until filing of final report;

(iii) The petitioner shall not attempt to interfere with the investigation or to influence or intimidate the de facto complainant or any witness in Crime No.281 of 2015 of Kumbla police station;

(iv) The petitioner shall not involve in any other crime while on bail.

If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the investigating officer in Crime No.281/2025 of Kumbla police station may file an application before the jurisdictional court, for cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top