SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 65037

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
AJMAL.T.M – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR – Respondent


“C.R.”

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S.

ST MONDAY, THE 1 DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 12TH CHAITHRA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 30017 OF 2018 PETITIONER/S:

AJMAL.T.M AGED 52 YEARS S/O. MUHAMMED KUNJU, THATTAM VEEDU, KALOOR, COCHIN -

682 017, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV C.Y.VINOD KUMAR RESPONDENT/S:

1 THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR KANAYANNUR TALUK OFFICE, PARK AVENUE ROAD, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN - 682 011.

2 THE GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GCDA)

KADAVANTHRA, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN - 682 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

3 THE SECRETARY GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GCDA), KADAVANTHRA, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN- 682 020.

4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER ELAMKULAM VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 020.

BY ADV SRI.MINI V.A., SC, GCDA OTHER PRESENT:

Sri. Bimal. K. Nath, Sr. G. P.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON

01.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

“C.R”

JUDGMENT

The demand raised under the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the “Revenue Recovery Act”) is questioned in this writ petition on the ground that it is barred by limitation. The facts in the present writ petition disclose that the petitioner entered into a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top