IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHA.S – Appellant
Versus
BRIJITH DANIEL – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 16TH CHAITHRA, 1946 OP(C) NO. 2190 OF 2023 EP NO.38 OF 2019 OF ADDITIONAL SUB COURT,ATTINGAL PETITIONER/PETITIONER/JUDGMENT DEBTOR/DEFENDANT:
SUSHA.S, AGED 63 YEARS, PRASANNA BHAVAN, CHENNAMCODE, VADASSERIKONAM P.O., OTTOOR VILLAGE, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695101 BY ADVS.DEEPU THANKAN UMMUL FIDA, LAKSHMI SREEDHAR LEKSHMI P. NAIR NAMITHA K.M.
RESPONDENT/DECREE HOLDER/PLAINTIFF:
BRIJITH DANIEL, AGED 53 YEARS SAJAN DALE, KUNNUELCHERI, MARATHADI P.O., KOLLAM, PIN - 695101 BY ADVS.M.R. Rajesh SANDHYA E.S.(K/2568/1999)
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
05.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Ext.P8 order passed by the Sub Court, Attingal (for short 'the trial court') is under challenge in this original petition.
2. The petitioner is the judgment debtor in E.P.No.38/2019 in O.S.No.40/2016. The respondent is the decree holder.
3. The decree was one for money. It was an ex-parte decree. The petitioner filed two applications as I.A.Nos. 137/2022 and 138/2022 to set aside the ex-parte decree and also to condon
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.