IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.

THURSDAY, THE 23^RD DAY OF MAY 2024 / 2ND JYAISHTA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 25558 OF 2015 PETITIONERS:

1 SANGEETHA MOBILES PVT. LTD., KASARAGOD BRANCH RS NO.126/5, XI/452A-8 KALLUVAPPIL TRADE CENTRE, OPP: NEW BUS STAND, NEXT TO BIG BAZAR, KASARAGOD, KERALA-671 121 REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATOIRY MR. ANIL KUMAR REDDY.

2 MEMMO GLOBAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS PVT. LTD., OPPOSITE POST OFFICE, DABAGARDEN, VISHAKPATANAM, ANDHGRA PRADESH-530 016, REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS AUITHORIZED SIGNATORY KAILASH LAKHYANI.

3 BENZ INDIA PVT. LTD., C 126 NARAINA INDUSTRIAL AREA PHASE 1, NEW DELHI-110 028, REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY ARVINDER SINGH.

4 KENSHA MOBILESM

363/64, SHIVAJINAGAR, PUNE 411005, REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY BHAVESH SOLANKI.

5 ALL INDIA MOBILE RETAILERS ASSOCIATION, C 126 NARAINA INDUSTRIAL AREA, PHASE 1, NEW DELHI-110 028, REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR.

ARVINDER SINGH.

BY ADV SRI.S.ANANTHAKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS:

1 UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF INDUATRIAL POLICY AND PROMOTION MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, UDYOG BHAWAN, NEW DELHI – 110 001.

2 UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, SHASTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI – 110 001.

3 UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001.

4 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, THROUGH GOVERNOR, 6, SANSAD MARG, P.B.NO.696, 5 ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, KANOOS CASTLE, MULLASSERY CANAL ROAD (WEST), COCHIN-682 011.

6 THE STATE OF KERALA, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, GROUND FLOOR, NORTH SANDWICH BLOCK, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADVS.

SRI.K.THYAGARAJESWARAN, CGC SRI.VENUGOPAL V, GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the writ petition has become infructuous.

In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

GOPINATH P.

JUDGE DK