SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 69882

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PARENT TEACHER ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) 15685/2016



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 3RD JYAISHTA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 15685 OF 2016 PETITIONER:

PARENT TEACHER ASSOCIATION VAIKOM MUHAMMED BASHEER SMARAKA GOVT VOCATIONAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THALAYOLAPARAMBU, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT T.P RAMESAN, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O PADMANABHAN, THADATHIL HOUSE, VELLOOR VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT BY ADV SRI.THOMAS MATHEW (KOPPARA)

RESPONDENTS:

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LAW AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001

2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, CIVIL STATION, KOTTAYAM 686 001

3 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, KOTTAYAM 686 001

4 THE HEAD MASTER, MUHAMMED BASHEER MEMORIAL GOVT.

HIGH SCHOOL THALAYOLAPARAMBU, KOTTAYAM 686 605

5 THELAYOLAPARAMBU GRAMA PANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THALAYOLAPARAMBU P.O, KOTTAYAM 686 605

6 VAIKOM MUHAMMED BASHEER SMARAKA SAMITHI REG NO K/349 PERUMBATTATHIL, 10/169, THALAYOLAPARAMBU P.O, KOTTAYAM 686 605, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, P.G. SHAJIMON.

SRI.BIJOY CHANDRAN-SR.GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Sathish Ninan, J.

==============================

W.P.(C) No.15685 of 2016 =====================================

Dated this the 24th day of May, 2024

JUDGMENT

When the matter was listed on 22/05/2024, there was no representation for the petitioner and the case was adjourned to 23/05/2024. On the said day also, there was no representation for the petitioner. It was adjourned to today. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner.

Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

Sathish Ninan, Judge SVP APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15685/2016 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE G.O MS 238/83 GL.

EDN DATED 24-01-1983 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF G.O MS 234/93-RD DATED

19-05-1993 EXHIBIT P3 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE G.OMS NO 503/2015 REVENUE DATED 29-09-2015 EXHIBIT P4 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE CHIEF MINISTER, STATE OF KERALA DATED 03-12-

2015

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top