SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 72033

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
LALUKKAS MOBILES – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER – Respondent


JUDGMENT

‘CR’

[W.P(C) Nos. 31559/2019, 25891/2020, 26515/2021,5995/2022,21545/2022, 27854/2022, 24327/2022, 36612/2022, 24677/2023, 37039/2023]

In the present batch of writ petitions, challenge has been made to Sections 16 (2)(c) and 16(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act and State Goods and Services Act, 2017.

Background:

2. It took 13 long years, i.e., 2004-2017, for Goods and Services Tax to finally arrive in India, and a new tax regime could see the light of the day with effect from 01.07.2017. The Kelkar Committee used the word ‘GST’ for the first time in a formal document, i.e., the Executive Summary of the Kelkar Committee report. The Kelkar Committee proposed that the Union and the States should concurrently tax the consumption of almost all goods and services in the economy, and it should be based on the principles of Value Added Tax (for short ‘the VAT’). All existing legislation taxing goods and services with cascading effects should be withdrawn. The GST would subsume existing indirect taxes including central excise and service tax.

2.1 ‘A White Paper on State-Level Value Added Tax’ (‘the white paper’) was published by the Empowered Committee of the State Finance

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top