Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, MR. P.M.MANOJ, JJ
DR. SANTHOSH KUMAR.K. – Appellant
Versus
SREE CHITRA TIRUNAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges tribunal's rejection of leave. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the context and reasoning behind seek of secondment leave. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. responses from both parties regarding the leave application. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. high court examines authority and need for interim relief. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. court's findings of necessity for prompt action to prevent injustice. (Para 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 6. final decision to grant the applicant requested leave. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT
Raja Vijayaraghavan, J.
This Original Petition is filed assailing the order dated 19.6.2024 in O.A.(CAT) No. 181/329/2024 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam. The Tribunal, by the aforesaid order, considered the interim prayer made by the petitioner for issuing directives to the 3rd respondent to implement the decision of the Governing Body to grant ‘Secondment Leave’ and rejected the same.
2. In view of the urgency involved, this matter was taken up for disposal with the consent of both sides.
3. For understanding the grievance of the petitioner, brief facts of the case, as is borne out from the Original application needs to be stated:
a) The petitioner is an Interventional Radiologist w
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
