IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
XX – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. lack of details in bail application. (Para 2) |
| 2. court's expectation regarding necessary details in bail applications. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
ORDER
The application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (in short, ‘Code’), for an order of pre-arrest bail.
2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in an unknown crime by the Sulthan Bathery Police Station, Kollam, for allegedly committing a non-bailable offence.
3. Heard; Sri.Alex K.John, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.Seetha S., the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.
4. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that the petitioner is the 3rd accused in the above crime, which has been registered against the accused for allegedly committing the predicate offence under Section 376 (2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code .
5. On a reading of the bail application, it can be seen that none of the details or materials pertaining to the incident, crime number, the offences or the rank of the accused have been stated. The bail application is vague and lacks the requisite details, particularly the offences levelled against the petitioner. It is well-settled inGurbaksh Singh Sibbi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.