SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 77900

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
NISHAMOL – Appellant
Versus
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.

FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 7TH ASHADHA, 1946 CON.CASE(C) NO. 1626 OF 2023 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.9148 OF 2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER:

MOIDEEN KUNHI AGED 65 YEARS S/O. HASSAINAR HAJI, MATTEMAR HOUSE, P.O.MAJBAIL, KASARAGOD, KERALA, PIN - 671323 BY ADVS.

UMMUL FIDA C.IJLAL R.UDAYA KUMAR RESPONDENTS:

INBASEKAR K S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, VIDYANAGAR, KASARAGOD, KERALA, PIN - 671123 OTHER PRESENT:

SRI. VENUGOPAL V (GP)

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader and having perused the supplementary award dated 02.11.2023, I am of the view that the contempt of court proceedings need not be continued. The petitioner is in any manner aggrieved by the supplementary award, it is for the petitioner to challenge the same in accordance with law.

With this observation, this Contempt of Court Case is closed.

Sd/-

GOPINATH P.

JUDG

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top