IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
FAZALUL RAHMAN PARI – Appellant
Versus
THE URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 20TH ASHADHA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 13560 OF 2024 PETITIONER/S:
FAZALUL RAHMAN PARI AGED 43 YEARS S/O ABOOBACKER PARY, FAZAL MANZIL, HAJIYARPALLI P.O , MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676519 BY ADVS.
RAFEEK. V.K.
U.M.HASSAN SALMAN FARIS ASWIN K.R.
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, NO.1758 PERINTHALMANNA, H.O. PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM, PIN -
679322
2 THE AUTHORISED OFFICER THE URBAN CO-OPERTIVE BANK LTD NO.1758 PERINTHALMANNA, H.O. PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 679322 BY ADVS.
JAYASREE K.P.
JOHN JOSEPH(K/000875/2019)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.07.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this court against the demand notice under Section 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 , issued by the respondent Bank. Hence, I am of the view that, the writ petition against the demand notice is not maintainable.
With the aforesaid contention, the present writ petition is dismissed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.